Author Description

There has been a growing recognition in the post- Cold War era that culture has increasingly become a factor in determining the course of today's complex and interconnected world. The U.S. experience in Afghanistan and Iraq extended this trend to national security and military operations. One might call this the Department of Defense's "cultural turn." The focus thus far has been on the importance of culture at the tactical and operational levels. There is also a growing recognition by the national security community that culture is an important factor at the policy and strategy levels. The ability to understand and appreciate the role and impact of culture on policy and strategy is increasingly seen as a critical strategic thinking skill. Cultural proficiency at the policy and strategic levels means the ability to consider history, values, ideology, politics, religion, and other cultural dimensions and assess their potential effect on policy and strategy. A more useful way to consider the role of culture in security studies than through the levels of war (tactical, operational, and strategic) is a framework that includes the following three dimensions: cultural considerations at the individual level; cultural considerations in tactical and operational level military operations; and cultural considerations at the political and strategic levels. Policymakers and strategists tend to view situations through their own cultural and strategic "lens" with insufficient consideration and calculation of the "other's" perspective and interests. The Analytical Cultural Framework for Strategy and Policy (ACFSP) is one systematic and analytical approach to the vital task of viewing the world through many lenses. The national security community is interested in cultural features or dimensions that drive political and strategic action and behavior. The ACFSP identifies basic cultural dimensions that seem to be of fundamental importance in determining such behavior and thus are of i