Author Description

Graph repair, restoring consistency of a graph, plays a prominent role in several areas of computer science and beyond: For example, in model-driven engineering, the abstract syntax of models is usually encoded using graphs. Flexible edit operations temporarily create inconsistent graphs not representing a valid model, thus requiring graph repair. Similarly, in graph databases--managing the storage and manipulation of graph data--updates may cause that a given database does not satisfy some integrity constraints, requiring also graph repair. We present a logic-based incremental approach to graph repair, generating a sound and complete (upon termination) overview of least-changing repairs. In our context, we formalize consistency by so-called graph conditions being equivalent to first-order logic on graphs. We present two kind of repair algorithms: State-based repair restores consistency independent of the graph update history, whereas deltabased (or incremental) repair takes this history explicitly into account. Technically, our algorithms rely on an existing model generation algorithm for graph conditions implemented in AutoGraph. Moreover, the delta-based approach uses the new concept of satisfaction (ST) trees for encoding if and how a graph satisfies a graph condition. We then demonstrate how to manipulate these STs incrementally with respect to a graph update. Die Reparatur von Graphen, die Wiederherstellung der Konsistenz eines Graphen, spielt in mehreren Bereichen der Informatik und darüber hinaus eine herausragende Rolle: Beispielsweise wird in der modellgetriebenen Konstruktion die abstrakte Syntax von Modellen in der Regel mithilfe von Graphen kodiert. Flexible Bearbeitungsvorgänge erstellen vorübergehend inkonsistente Diagramme, die kein gültiges Modell darstellen, und erfordern daher eine Reparatur des Diagramms. Auf ähnliche Weise können Aktualisierungen in Graphendatenbanken - die das Speichern und Bearbeiten von Graphendaten verwalten - dazu führen, d