Starting In The Latter Part Of The 20th Century, The Law Of Sexual Offenses, Especially In The West, Began To Reflect A Striking Divergence. On The One Hand, The Law Became Significantly More Punitive In Its Approach To Sexual Conduct That Is Nonconsensual Or Unwanted, As Evidenced By A Major Expansion In The Definition Of Rape And Sexual Assault, And The Creation Of New Offenses Like Sex Trafficking, Child Grooming, Revenge Porn, And Female Genital Mutilation. On The Other Hand, It Became Markedly More Permissive In How It Dealt With Conduct That Is Consensual, A Trend That Can Be Seen, For Example, In The Legalization Or Decriminalization Of Sodomy, Adultery, And Adult Pornography. This Book Explores The Conceptual And Normative Implications Of This Divergence. In Doing So, It Assumes That The Proper Role Of The Criminal Law In A Liberal State Is To Protect Individuals In Their Right Not To Be Subjected To Sexual Contact Against Their Will, While Also Safeguarding Their Right To Engage In (private Consensual) Sexual Conduct In Which They Do Wish To Participate. Although Consistent In The Abstract, These Dual Aims Frequently Come Into Conflict In Practice. The Book Develops A Framework For Harmonization In The Context Of A Wide Range Of Nonconsensual, Consensual, And Aconsensual Sexual Offenses (hence, The Unified Nature Of The Theory) -- Including Rape-as-unconsented-to-sex, Rape-by-deceit, Rape-by-coercion, Rape Of A Person Who Lacks Capacity To Consent, Statutory Rape, Abuse Of Position, Sexual Harassment, Voyeurism, Indecent Exposure, Incest, Sadomasochistic Assault, Prostitution, Bestiality, And Necrophilia-- Provided By Publisher.