Author Description

The commentary tradition regarding 1 Corinthians unanimously identifies the &quot;weak&quot; as Christ-followers whose faith was not yet sufficient to indulge in the eating of idol food with indifference, as if ideally Paul wanted them to become &quot;strong&quot; enough to do so. Commentaries also do not hesitate to explain that Paul advised the Corinthians that he behaved like non-Jews (e.g., ate idol food) in order to win non-Jews to Christ, convinced that he was free from any obligation to observe Jewish covenantal behavior--except when he expediently chose to mimic Jewish behavior in order to win Jews to Christ.<br> <br> Similarly, commentators continue to conclude that in Philippians Paul called Jews &quot;dogs&quot; for upholding the value of undertaking circumcision, and that he renounced such identification as &quot;mutilation.&quot;<br> <br> None of these interpretations likely represent what Paul meant originally, according to Nanos. Each essay explains why, and provides new alternatives for re-reading Paul's language &quot;within Judaism.&quot; In this process, Nanos combines investigations of relevant elements from Jewish sources and from various Cynic and other Greco-Roman contemporaries, as well as the New Testament.