Author Description

KANTS CRITIQUE OF AESTHETIC JUDGEMENT TRANSLATED, WITH SEVEN INTRODUCTORY ESSAYS NOTES, AND ANALYTICAL INDEX BY JAMES CREED MEREDITH M. A, N. U. I., SEN, MOD. T. C. D. Yea, what were mighty Natures self 1 Her features, could they win us, Unhelped by the poetic voice That hourly speaks within us WORDSWORTH. OXFORD AT THE CLARENDON PRESS 1911 PREFACE IT seems a strange fact that the works which have exerted the greatest and most permanent Influence are those of which it is most difficult to give a final and conclusive interpretation. Is it that the philosophic mind merely amuses itself looking for the answers to riddles the solution of which destroys the interest, so that it is not so much misinterpretation as explana tion that great philosophers have to fear Or is it that philosophers propose questions which depend upon higher categories than those of common understanding, with the natural result that their point of view is but imperfectly comprehended by lesser minds Or is it simply that the works that have exerted most influence are those which are most comprehensive and many-sided, and that different critics seize upon different aspects of the whole, and throw the emphasis on different points It is not necessary to attempt to answer these questions generally, or further than affects Kants Aesthetics. Certainly no work has exerted an equal influence on the subsequent history of aesthetics, and yet it has been most variously interpreted. However, while critics differ as to Kants meaning on many essential points, they seem to be mostly agreed that the chief source of strength in the work lies in its comprehensiveness and its method. How they have been able to arrive at this conclusion inthe face of their own criticisms, is a different matter. For they have for the most part attempted to show that the work as a whole involves an important modification of Kants fundamental position of critical idealism, and that in its different parts it betrays considerable hesitation